Current issue
Online first
Archive
About the Journal
Editorial Office
Editorial Board
Copy right and self-archiving policy
Peer review process
Instructions for Reviewers
Printed version subscription
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Instructions for Authors
Policies
General information
Open Access, Licensing terms, Commercial use and Copyright terms policies
Self-archiving policy and Archive policies
Article Correction and Withdrawal policy
Manuscript Submission policy
Authorship policy
Conflict of Interest policy
Language considerations policy
Plagiarism and Duplicate publications policy
Ethics policy
Review process policy
Acceptance of manuscripts policy
Online First Articles and Special Issues policies
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) policy
Advertising policy
Article publication charges
Policies
General information
Open Access, Licensing terms, Commercial use and Copyright terms policies
Self-archiving policy and Archive policies
Article Correction and Withdrawal policy
Manuscript Submission policy
Authorship policy
Conflict of Interest policy
Language considerations policy
Plagiarism and Duplicate publications policy
Ethics policy
Review process policy
Acceptance of manuscripts policy
Online First Articles and Special Issues policies
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) policy
Advertising policy
ORIGINAL PAPER
Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri on the nutritive value of Sucrosorgo 506 bagasse silage
1
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Chełmońskiego 38 C, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland
2
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, The Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Institute of Soil Science and Environmental Protection, Grunwaldzka 53, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland
3
University of Warmia and Mazury, Faculty of Bioengineering, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
Publication date: 2020-06-30
Corresponding author
M. Wilk
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Chełmońskiego 38 C, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Chełmońskiego 38 C, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland
J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2020;29(2):158-166
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Sweet sorghum bagasse (SSB) is a dry pulpy residue that remains
after the extraction of juice from Sorghum saccharatum for ethanol production,
and represents unused plant biomass that can be used in livestock feeding.
The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of heterofermentative
bacteria Lactobacillus buchneri, added during ensiling process to Sucrosorgo 506
bagasse, on anaerobic stability, nutritional value, in vitro ruminal and intestinal
disappearances and quality of silage in micro-silos. In this experiment, the
inoculant was applied at a rate of 5 × 104 CFU/ml (B1). Sucrosorgo 506 bagasse
silage without the additive served as control (B0). The basic composition, the
content of minerals and the amino acid profile were determined for both fresh
and ensiled materials. The aerobic stability, NH3-N content and pH value of the
silage were determined to evaluate its quality. A positive effect of the addition
of L. buchneri on the nutritional value and quality, especially volatile fatty acid
profile was revealed. It was also found that both investigated Sucrosorgo 506
bagasse silages were aerobically stable and exhibited satisfactory quality. The
silage prepared with L. buchneri had better effective ruminal degradability and
intestinal digestibility in vitro.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
AOAC International, 2011. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC, 18th Edition. 4th Revision. Gaithersburg, MD (USA).
2.
Bean B., McCollum T., Villarreal B., Blumenthal J., Robinson J., Brandon R., Buttrey E., Van Meter R., Pietsch D., 2009. Texas panhandle forage sorghum silage trial. AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Amarillo. Accessed May, 2020, https://amarillo-tamu-edu.wpen...
3.
Bernardes A.P., Tremblay G.F., Bélanger G., Séguin P., Brégard A., Vanasse A., 2016. Bagasse silage from sweet pearl millet and sweet sorghum as influenced by harvest dates and delays between biomass chopping and pressing. Bioenerg. Res. 9, 88–97, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155....
4.
Bingöl H.T., Baytok E., 2003. The effects of some silage additives in sorghum silage on the silage quality and ruminal degradability of nutrients. I. The effects on silage quality. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 27, 15–20.
5.
Calsamiglia S., Stern M.D., 1995. A three-step in vitro procedure for estimating intestinal digestion of proteins in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 73, 1459–1465, https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7....
6.
Danner H., Holzer M., Mayrhuber E., Braun R., 2003. Acetic acid increases stability of silage under aerobic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 562–567, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69....
7.
Eggleston G., Cole M., Andrzejewski B., 2013. New commercially viable processing technologies for the production of sugar feedstocks from sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) for biofuel and bioproducts manufacture. Sugar Tech. 15, 232–249, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355....
8.
Fijałkowska M., Przemieniecki S.W., Purwin C., Lipiński K., Kurowski T.P., Karwowska A., 2020. The effect of an additive containing three Lactobacillus species on the fermentation pattern and microbiological status of silage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 3, 1174–1184, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1....
9.
Garzia L., Giovanna S., 1984. A survey of lactic acid bacteria in Italian silage. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 56, 373–379, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365...
10.
Głąb L., Sowiński J., Chmielewska J., Prask H., Fugol M., Szlachta J., 2019. Comparison of the energy efficiency of methane and ethanol production from sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) with a variety of feedstock management technologies. Biomass Bioenerg. 129, 105332, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biom....
11.
Heron S.J.E., Wilkinson J.F., Duffus C.M., 1993. Enterobacteria associated with grass and silages. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 75, 13–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
12.
Houška M., da Silva V.M.F. (Editors), 2017. High Pressure Processing of Fruit and Vegetable Products. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL (USA), https://doi.org/10.1201/978131....
13.
Houx J.H., Roberts C.A., Fritschi F.B., 2013. Evaluation of sweet sorghum bagasse as an alternative livestock feed. Crop Sci. 53,1784-1790, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsc....
14.
Jatkauskas J., Vrotniakiene V., Ohlsson Ch., Lund B., 2013. The effects of three silage inoculants on aerobic stability in grass, clover-grass, lucerne and maize silages. Agric. Food Sci. 22, 137–144, https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci....
15.
Kang T.W., Adesogan A.T., Kim S.C., Lee S.S., 2009. Effects of an esterase-producing inoculant on fermentation, aerobic stability, and neutral detergent fiber digestibility of corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 732–738, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
16.
Kostulak-Zielińska M., Potkański A., 2001. Quality of baled grass-clover silages ensiled with chemical additives. Chemical composition. Ann. Anim. Sci. 1, 153–165.
17.
Liu R., Shen F., 2008. Impacts of main factors on bioethanol fermentation from stalk juice of sweet sorghum by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CICC 1308). Bioresour. Technol. 99, 847–854, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior....
18.
McDonald P., Edwards R.A., Greenhalgh J.F.D., Morgan C.A., Sinclair L.A., Wilkinson R.G., 2011. Animal Nutrition. 7th Edition. Trans-Atlantic Publications. Philadelphia, PA (USA)
19.
Moharrery A., 2007. The determination of buffering capacity of some ruminant’s feedstuffs and their cumulative effects on TMR ration. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2, 72–78, https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp....
20.
Morvay Y., Bannink A., France J., Kebreab E., Dijkstra J., 2011. Evaluation of models to predict the stoichiometry of volatile fatty acid profiles in rumen fluid of lactating Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 3063–3080, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
21.
Muck R.E., Shinners K.J., 2001. Conserved forage (silage and hay): progress and priorities. In: Proceedings of International Grassland Congress, São Pedro (Brasil), 19, 753–762
22.
Naeini S.Z., Khorvash M., Rowghani E., Bayat A., Nikousefat Z., 2014. Effects of urea and molasses supplementation on chemical composition, protein fractionation and fermentation characteristics of sweet sorghum and bagasse silages as alternative silage crop compared with maize silage in the arid areas. Res. Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci. 4, 343–352.
23.
Ørskov E.R., McDonald I., 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 92, 499–503, https://doi.org/10.1017/S00218....
24.
Oude E.S.J., Krooneman J., Gottschal J.C., Spoelstra S.F., Faber F., Driehuis F., 2001. Anaerobic conversion of lactic acid and 1,2-propanediol by Lactobacillus buchneri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 125–132, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67....
25.
Promkhambut A., Younger A., Polthanee A., Akkasaeng C., 2010. Morphological and physiological responses of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to water logging. Asian J. Plant Sci. 9, 183–193, https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2....
26.
Ratnavathi C.V., Patil J.V., Chavan U.D., 2016. Sorghum Biochemistry: An Industrial Perspective. Academic Press, Elsevier. Cambridge, MA (USA), https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-...
27.
Tedeschi L.O., Pell A.N., Fox D.G., Llames C.R., 2001. The amino acid profiles of the whole plant and of four plant residues from temperate and tropical forages. J. Anim. Sci. 79, 525, https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7....
28.
Thomas M.E., Foster J.L, McCuistion K.C., Redmon L.A., Jessup R.W., 2013. Nutritive value, fermentation characteristics, and in situ disappearance kinetics of sorghum silage treated with inoculants. J. Dairy Sci. 96, 7120–7131, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20...
29.
Venkata Seshaiah C., Ramana Reddy Y., Nagalakshmi D., Jagadeeswara R.S., 2012. Evaluation of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L. Moench) bagasse by chemical, in sacco and in vivo techniques in graded Murrah buffalo bulls. J. Vet. Adv. 2, 418–423
30.
Wang Y., He L., Xing Y., Zheng Y., Zhou W., Pian R., Yang F., Chen X., Zhang Q., 2019. Dynamics of bacterial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of wilted and unwilted Moringa oleifera leaf silage with or without lactic acid bacterial inoculants. mSphere, https://doi.org/10.1128/mSpher....
31.
Ward J.D., Redfearn D.D., McCormick M.E., Cuomo G.J., 2001. Chemical composition, ensiling characteristics, and apparent digestibility of summer annual forages in sub-tropical doublecropping system with annual ryegrass. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 177–182, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0....
32.
Weinberg Z.G., Ashbell G., Hen Y., Azrieli A., Szakacs G., Filya I., 2002. Ensiling whole-crop wheat and corn in large containers with Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28, 7–11, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/jim...
33.
Williams S.D., Shinners K.J., 2012. Farm-scale anaerobic storage and aerobic stability of high dry matter sorghum as a biomass feedstock. Biomass Bioenerg. 46, 309–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biom....
34.
Yemm E.W., Willis A.J., 1954. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J. 57, 508–514, https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0570....
35.
Yu P., McKinnon J.J., Christensen D.A., 2005. Hydroxycinnamic acids and ferulic acid esterase in relation to biodegradation of complex plant cell walls. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 85, 255–267, https://doi.org/10.4141/A04-01....
CITATIONS (2):
1.
Changes in the In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation of Diets for Dairy Cows Based on Selected Sorghum Cultivars Compared to Maize, Rye and Grass Silage
Ewa Pecka-Kiełb, Dorota Miśta, Bożena Króliczewska, Andrzej Zachwieja, Maja Słupczyńska, Barbara Król, Józef Sowiński
Agriculture
Ewa Pecka-Kiełb, Dorota Miśta, Bożena Króliczewska, Andrzej Zachwieja, Maja Słupczyńska, Barbara Król, Józef Sowiński
Agriculture
2.
Innovative strategy to enhance bioconversion of sweet sorghum bagasse (SSB) by the combination of bio-fortified ensiling and dilute alkali pretreatment
Haiwei Ren, Ruifeng Shi, Dongmin Yang, Hui Tian, Li Wang, Zhe Ling, Jinping Li, Lianhua Li, Yongming Sun, Yi Zheng
Industrial Crops and Products
Haiwei Ren, Ruifeng Shi, Dongmin Yang, Hui Tian, Li Wang, Zhe Ling, Jinping Li, Lianhua Li, Yongming Sun, Yi Zheng
Industrial Crops and Products
| ISSN: | 1230-1388 |
Assigning DOI numbers, introducing articles from supplements and recent publications to POL-index database, maintaining anti-plagiarism detection, electronic system to proceed manuscripts and webpage of the Journal with interactive pdf files, and language correction of manuscripts published in Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences are financed in the years 2018–2019 by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education from the funds for science popularization activities, Agreement No. 631/P-DUN/2018.
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
