Current issue
Online first
Archive
About the Journal
Editorial Office
Editorial Board
Copy right and self-archiving policy
Peer review process
Instructions for Reviewers
Printed version subscription
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Instructions for Authors
Policies
General information
Open Access, Licensing terms, Commercial use and Copyright terms policies
Self-archiving policy and Archive policies
Article Correction and Withdrawal policy
Manuscript Submission policy
Authorship policy
Conflict of Interest policy
Language considerations policy
Plagiarism and Duplicate publications policy
Ethics policy
Review process policy
Acceptance of manuscripts policy
Online First Articles and Special Issues policies
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) policy
Advertising policy
Article publication charges
Policies
General information
Open Access, Licensing terms, Commercial use and Copyright terms policies
Self-archiving policy and Archive policies
Article Correction and Withdrawal policy
Manuscript Submission policy
Authorship policy
Conflict of Interest policy
Language considerations policy
Plagiarism and Duplicate publications policy
Ethics policy
Review process policy
Acceptance of manuscripts policy
Online First Articles and Special Issues policies
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) policy
Advertising policy
ORIGINAL PAPER
Preliminary study of the effects of Apilactobacillus kunkeei
EIR/BG-1 and Enterococcus hirae EIR/CM-2 supplementation
on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbial population
1
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Physiology, 15030 Burdur, Turkey
2
Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 06110 Ankara, Turkey
3
Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Physiology, 06110 Ankara, Turkey
4
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Scientific and Technology Application and Research Center, 15030 Burdur, Turkey
5
Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, 06110 Ankara, Turkey
6
Ankara University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Pharmabiotic Technologies Research Laboratory, 06100 Ankara, Turkey
Publication date: 2023-10-20
Corresponding author
A. Demirtas
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Physiology, 15030 Burdur, Turkey
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Physiology, 15030 Burdur, Turkey
J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2024;33(1):88-100
KEYWORDS
direct feed microorganismsfeed additiveslactic acid bacteriaprobioticsrumen bacteriaruminal fermentation
TOPICS
cattlefeed additivesmicrobiologymolecular biologynutritionprobiotics, prebiotics, symbiotics, eubiotics, antibioticsrumen fermentationphysiology
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to assess the impact of potential probiotic
strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Apilactobacillus kunkeei EIR/BG-1 isolated
from the gut of honeybees, and Enterococcus hirae EIR/CM-2 isolated from
cow’s milk, on rumen fermentation parameters and microbial population in a high-concentrate
diet using a rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). The experiment
consisted of 7 days of adaptation and 7 days of data collection. The dietary
treatments were as follows: no additives (control), addition of 1 ml/fermenter (108
CFU) of Al. kunkeei EIR/BG-1, and addition of 1 ml/fermenter (108 CFU) of E.
hirae EIR/CM-2. Alongside rumen fermentation characteristics, rumen microbial
composition was investigated using real-time PCR. Supplementation with LAB
strains did not affect ruminal pH, production of methane, and total and individual
short chain fatty acids, ammonia-N concentration, dry matter digestibility
and total protozoa. However, the abundance of Ruminococcus flavefaciens
increased in the Al. kunkeei EIR/BG-1 treatment (P < 0.05). Moreover, the size
of R. flavefaciens population in E. hirae EIR/CM-2 was comparable to that in
the Al. kunkeei EIR/BG-1 treatment. Selenomonas ruminantium was more
abundant in the Al. kunkeei EIR/BG-1 treatment compared to the E. hirae
EIR/CM-2 treatment (P < 0.05). The abundance of Streptococcus bovis and
Megasphaera elsdenii decreased with both Al. kunkeei EIR/BG-1 and E. hirae
EIR/CM-2 supplementations (P < 0.05). In conclusion, Al. kunkeei EIR/BG-1
and E. hirae EIR/CM-2 exhibited beneficial effects on some members of the
rumen microbial population, although these effects did not manifest in significant
alterations in ruminal fermentation. Further research is required to clarify the
probiotic potentials of these LAB strains as feed additives for ruminant rations.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of
interest.
REFERENCES (64)
1.
Abdl-Rahman M.A., 2010. In vitro manipulation of rumen fermentation efficiency by fumaric acid – bentonite coupled addition as an alternative to antibiotics. J. Agric. Sci. 2, 174–180, https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v2....
2.
Ahmad W., Khaliq S., Akhtar N., El Arab J., Akhtar K., Prakash S., Anwar M.A., Munawar N., 2022. Whole genome sequence analysis of a novel Apilactobacillus species from giant honeybee (Apis dorsata) gut reveals occurrence of genetic elements coding prebiotic and probiotic traits. Microorganisms 10, 904, https://doi.org/10.3390/microo....
3.
Amin A.B., Mao S., 2021. Influence of yeast on rumen fermentation, growth performance and quality of products in ruminants: A review. Anim. Nutr. 7, 31–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anin....
4.
AOAC International, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th Edition. Gaithersburg, MD (USA).
5.
Arredondo D., Castelli L., Porrini M.P., Garrido P.M., Eguaras M.J., Zunino P., Antunez K., 2018. Lactobacillus kunkeei strains decreased the infection by honey bee pathogens Paenibacillus larvae and Nosema ceranae. Benef. Microbes 9, 279–290, https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2017....
6.
Attwood G.T., Klieve A.V., Ouwerkerk D., Patel B.K.C., 1998. Ammoniahyperproducing bacteria from New Zealand ruminants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 1796–1804, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.64....
7.
Azzaz H.H., Kholif A.E., Murad H.A., Vargas-Bello-Pérez E., 2022. A newly developed strain of Enterococcus faecium isolated from fresh dairy products to be used as a probiotic in lactating Holstein cows. Front. Vet. Sci. 9, 989606, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.....
8.
Badel S., Bernardi T., Michaud, P., 2011. New perspectives for Lactobacilli exopolysaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 29, 54–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biot....
9.
Becquet P., 2003. EU assessment of enterococci as feed additives. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 88, 247–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-....
10.
Beecher C., Daly M., Berry D.P., Klostermann K., Flynn J., Meaney W., Hill C., McCarthy T.V., Ross R.P., Giblin L., 2009. Administration of a live culture of Lactococcus lactis DPC3147 into the bovine mammary gland stimulates the local host immune response, particularly IL-1 and IL-8 gene expression. J. Dairy Res. 76, 340–348, https://doi.org/10.1017/S00220....
11.
Bintsis T., 2018. Lactic acid bacteria: their applications in foods. J. Bacteriol. Mycol. Open Acess 6, 89–94, https://doi.org/10.15406/jbmoa....
12.
Chaney A.L., Marbach E.P., 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin. Chem. 8, 130–132, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinch....
13.
Chen L., Ren A., Zhou C., Tan Z., 2017. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation for improving in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of cereal straws. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 16, 52–60, https://doi.org/10.1080/182805....
14.
Counotte G.H.M., Prins R.A., 1981. Regulation of lactate metabolism in the rumen. Vet. Res. Commun. 5, 101–115, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0221....
15.
Czerkawski J.W., Breckenridge G., 1977. Design and development of a long term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Brit. J. Nutr. 38, 371–384, https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN197....
16.
Demirtas A., Musa S.A.A., Salgirli-Demirbas Y., Ozturk H., Pekcan M., Toprak N.N., Safak E., Unler M., Saral B., Emre M.B., 2021. The effects of Pinus brutia bark extract on pure and mixed continuous cultures of rumen bacteria and archaea, and fermentation characteristics in vitro. Vet. Arhiv 91, 523–535, https://doi.org/10.24099/vet.a....
17.
Demirtas A., Ozturk H., Sudagidan M., Keyvan E., Yavuz O., Gulay O.Y., Musa, S.A.A., 2019. Effects of commercial aldehydes from green leaf volatiles (green odour) on rumen microbial population and fermentation profile in an artificial rumen (Rusitec). Anaerobe 55, 83–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anae....
18.
Denman S.E., McSweeney C.S., 2005. Quantitative (real-time) PCR. In: H.S. Makkar, C. McSweeney (Editors). Methods in Gut Microbial Ecology for Ruminants. Springer. Dordrecht (Netherlands), pp. 105–115, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020....
19.
Denman S.E., McSweeney C.S., 2006. Development of a realtime PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 58, 572–582, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574....
20.
Denman S.E., Tomkins N.W., McSweeney C.S., 2007. Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 62, 313–322, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574....
21.
Doyle N., Mbandlwa P., Kelly W.J., Attwood G., Li Y., Ross R.P., Stanton C., Leahy S., 2019. Use of lactic acid bacteria to reduce methane production in ruminants, a critical review. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2207, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.....
22.
El-Nor S.A., AbuGhazaleh A.A., Potu R.B., Hastings D., Khattab M.S.A., 2010. Effects of differing levels of glycerol on rumen fermentation and bacteria. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 162, 99–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anif....
23.
Espeche M.C., Pellegrino M., Frola I., Larriestra A., Bogni C., Nader-Macías M.F., 2012. Lactic acid bacteria from raw milk as potentially beneficial strains to prevent bovine mastitis. Anaerobe 18, 103–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anae....
24.
Fuller R., 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66, 365–378, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
25.
Gill H.S., Shu Q., Leng R.A., 2000. Immunization with Streptococcus bovis protects against lactic acidosis in sheep. Vaccine 18, 2541–2548, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-....
26.
Gómez J.A., Tejido M.L., Carro M.D., 2005. Influence of disodium malate on microbial growth and fermentation in rumen-simulation technique fermenters receiving medium-and high-concentrate diets. Brit. J. Nutr. 93, 479–484, https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN200....
27.
Guo G., Shen C., Liu Q., Zhang S., Shao T., Wang C., Wang Y., Xu Q., Huo W., 2020. The effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculums on in vitro rumen fermentation, methane production, ruminal cellulolytic bacteria populations and cellulase activities of corn stover silage. J. Integr. Agr. 19, 838–847, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-....
28.
Indira M., Venkateswarulu T.C., Abraham Peele K., Nazneen Bobby M., Krupanidhi S., 2019. Bioactive molecules of probiotic bacteria and their mechanism of action: a review. 3 Biotech 9, 306, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205....
29.
ISO, 2000. Animal feeding stuffs – Determination of starch content – Polarimetric method. Standard ISO 6493 (E): 2000. International Organization for Standardization. Geneva (Switzerland).
30.
Jiao Y., Darzi Y., Tawaratsumida K. et al., 2013. Induction of bone loss by pathobiont-mediated Nod1 signaling in the oral cavity. Cell Host Microbe 13, 595–601, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom....
31.
Kim S.H., Mamuad L.L., Kim D.W., Kim S.K., Lee S.S., 2016. Fumarate reductase-producing enterococci reduce methane production in rumen fermentation in vitro. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26, 558–566, http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.....
32.
Kiran F., Sevin S., Ceylan A., 2023. Biocontrol potential of Apilactobacillus kunkeei EIR/BG-1 against infectious diseases in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Vet. Res. Commun. 47, 753–765, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259....
33.
Klieve A.V., Hennessy D., Ouwerkerk D., Forster R.J., Mackie R.I., Attwood G.T., 2003. Establishing populations of Megasphaera elsdenii YE 34 and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens YE 44 in the rumen of cattle fed high grain diets. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95, 621–630, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365....
34.
Krehbiel C.R., Rust S.R., Zhang G., Gilliland S.E., 2003. Bacterial direct-fed microbials in ruminant diets: performance response and mode of action. J. Anim. Sci. 81, 120–132, https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8....
35.
Kulkarni N.A., Chethan H.S., Srivastava R., Gabbur A.B., 2022. Role of probiotics in ruminant nutrition as natural modulators of health and productivity of animals in tropical countries: an overview. Trop. Anim. Health Pro. 54, 110, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250....
36.
Li X., Durmic Z., Liu S., McSweeney C.S., Vercoe P.E., 2014. Eremophila glabra reduces methane production and methanogen populations when fermented in a Rusitec. Anaerobe 29, 100–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anae....
37.
Mamuad L.L., Kim S.H., Biswas A.A., Yu Z., Cho K.K., Kim S.B., Lee K., Lee S.S., 2019. Rumen fermentation and microbial community composition influenced by live Enterococcus faecium supplementation. AMB Express 9, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568....
38.
Melo C. de C.S., da Silva Freire A., Galdeano M.A., da Costa C.F., de Oliveira Gonçalves A.P.D., Dias F.S., Menezes D.R., 2021. Probiotic potential of Enterococcus hirae in goat milk and its survival in canine gastrointestinal conditions simulated in vitro. Res. Vet. Sci. 138, 188–195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc....
39.
Meng X., Gangoiti J., Wang X., Grijpstra P., van Leeuwen S.S., Pijning T., Dijkhuizen L., 2018. Biochemical characterization of a GH70 protein from Lactobacillus kunkeei DSM 12361 with two catalytic domains involving branching sucrase activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 102, 7935–7950, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253....
40.
Mombach M.A., da Silva Cabral L., Lima L.R., Ferreira D.C., e Pedreira B.C., Pereira D.H., 2021. Association of ionophores, yeast, and bacterial probiotics alters the abundance of ruminal microbial species of pasture intensively finished beef cattle. Trop. Anim. Health Pro. 53, 172, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250....
41.
Morovský M., Pristaš P., Czikková S., Javorský P., 1998. A bacteriocinmediated antagonism by Enterococcus faecium BC25 against ruminal Streptococcus bovis. Microbiol. Res. 153, 277–281, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0944-....
42.
Mosoni P., Chaucheyras-Durand F., Béra-Maillet C., Forano E., 2007. Quantification by real-time PCR of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen of sheep after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates: effect of a yeast additive. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103, 2676–2685, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
43.
NRC (National Research Council), 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. 6th Edition. National Academies Press. Washington, DC (USA).
44.
Ouwerkerk D., Klieve A.V., Forster R.J., 2002. Enumeration of Megasphaera elsdenii in rumen contents by real-time Taq nuclease assay. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92, 753–758, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365....
45.
Peterson R.E., Klopfenstein T.J., Erickson G.E., Folmer J., Hinkley S., Moxley R.A., Smith D.R., 2007. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus strain NP51 on Escherichia coli O157: H7 fecal shedding and finishing performance in beef feedlot cattle. J. Food Protect. 70, 287–291, https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-0....
46.
Raeth-Knight M.L., Linn J.G., Jung H.G., 2007. Effect of direct-fed microbials on performance, diet digestibility, and rumen characteristics of Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 1802–1809, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
47.
Sevin S., Karaca B., Haliscelik O., Kibar H., OmerOglou E., Kiran F., 2021. Postbiotics secreted by Lactobacillus sakei EIR/CM-1 isolated from cow milk microbiota, display antibacterial and antibiofilm activity against ruminant mastitis-causing pathogens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 20, 1302–1316, https://doi.org/10.1080/182805....
48.
Sheikh G.G., Ganai A.M., Ahmad Sheikh A., Mir D.M., 2022. Rumen microflora, fermentation pattern and microbial enzyme activity in sheep fed paddy straw based complete feed fortified with probiotics. Biol. Rhythm Res. 53, 547–558, https://doi.org/10.1080/092910....
49.
Simsek D., Kiymaci M.E., Tok K.C., Gumustas M., Altanlar N., 2022. Investigation of the probiotic and metabolic potential of Fructobacillus tropaeoli and Apilactobacillus kunkeei from apiaries. Arch. Microbiol. 204, 432, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203....
50.
Soriano A.P., Mamuad L.L., Kim S.H., Choi Y.J., Jeong C.D., Bae G.S., Chang M.B., Lee S.S., 2014. Effect of Lactobacillus mucosae on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of dried brewers grain, methane production and bacterial diversity. Asian Australas. J. Anim. 27, 1562–1570, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2....
51.
Stefańska B., Sroka J., Katzer F., Goliński P., Nowak W., 2021. The effect of probiotics, phytobiotics and their combination as feed additives in the diet of dairy calves on performance, rumen fermentation and blood metabolites during the preweaning period. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 272, 114738, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anif....
52.
Tajima K., Aminov R.I., Nagamine T., Matsui H., Nakamura M., Benno Y., 2001. Diet dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with Real-Time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 2766–2774, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67....
53.
TSE (Turkish Standards Institute), 1991. Animal feed – determination of metabolisable energy (chemical method). Publication No. 9610. Ankara (Turkey), pp. 1–3.
54.
Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 3583–3597, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0....
55.
Vieco-Saiz N., Belguesmia Y., Raspoet R., Auclair E., Gancel F., Kempf I., Drider D., 2019. Benefits and inputs from lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters during food-animal production. Front. Microbiol. 10, 57, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.....
56.
Wang Y., Alexander T.W., McAllister T.A., 2009. In vitro effects of phlorotannins from Ascophyllum nodosum (brown seaweed) on rumen bacterial populations and fermentation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 89, 2252–2260, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3....
57.
Watanabe Y., Suzuki R., Koike S., Nagashima K., Mochizuki M., Forster R.J., Kobayashi Y., 2010. In vitro evaluation of cashew nut shell liquid as a methane-inhibiting and propionate-enhancing agent for ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 5258–5267, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
58.
Weinberg Z.G., Shatz O., Chen Y., Yosef E., Nikbahat M., Ben-Ghedalia D., Miron J., 2007. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on in vitro digestibility of wheat and corn silages. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 4754–4762, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
59.
Wolin M.J., 1960. A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. J. Dairy Sci. 43, 1452–1459, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0....
60.
Xu H., Huang W., Hou Q., Kwok L.Y., Sun Z., Ma H., Zhao F., Lee Y.K., Zhang H., 2017. The effects of probiotics administration on the milk production, milk components and fecal bacteria microbiota of dairy cows. Sci. Bull. 62, 767–774, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib....
61.
Yang H.E., Zotti C.A., McKinnon J.J., McAllister T.A., 2018. Lactobacilli are prominent members of the microbiota involved in the ruminal digestion of barley and corn. Front. Microbiol. 9, 718, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.....
62.
Zhang R., Dong X., Zhou M., Tu Y., Zhang N., Deng K., Diao Q., 2017. Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus subtilis on rumen fermentation and the bacterial community in calves. Anim. Sci. J. 88, 755–762, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12....
63.
Zhang L., Jiang X., Liu X., Zhao X., Liu S., Li Y., Zhang Y., 2019. Growth, health, rumen fermentation, and bacterial community of Holstein calves fed Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG during the preweaning stage. J. Anim. Sci. 97, 2598–2608, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sk....
64.
Zhu W., Wei Z., Xu N., Yang F., Yoon I., Chung Y., Liu J., Wang J., 2017. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on performance and rumen fermentation and microbiota in dairy cows fed a diet containing low quality forage. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 8, 36, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| ISSN: | 1230-1388 |
Assigning DOI numbers, introducing articles from supplements and recent publications to POL-index database, maintaining anti-plagiarism detection, electronic system to proceed manuscripts and webpage of the Journal with interactive pdf files, and language correction of manuscripts published in Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences are financed in the years 2018–2019 by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education from the funds for science popularization activities, Agreement No. 631/P-DUN/2018.
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
