SHORT COMMUNICATION
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the effects of different types of zeolites and their contribution in the diet on polysaccharidases activity in the rumen of heifers. Natural and synthetic zeolites and their various amounts (2 and 4% dry matter) were used. The study was performed on 5 rumen-fistulated Jersey heifers in a 5 x 5 Latin square design with 5 dietary treatments (control, 2% natural zeolites – ZN2, 2% synthetic zeolites – ZS2, 4% natural zeolites – ZN4, 4% synthetic zeolites – ZS4) and 5 experimental periods. The samples of ruminal digesta were taken from animals before feeding and 3 h after feeding. The significant interactions of diet and sampling time were shown for cellulolytic (P = 0.005), xylanolytic (P = 0.050) and amylolytic (P = 0.044) activities. The addition of 4% ZN to the diet significantly increased pectinolytic activity in the rumen in comparison to control group (P = 0.035). Interestingly, an upward trend of amylolytic activity has been shown (P = 0.082) in ZN2 group. The incorporation of 2% ZS to the diet significantly increased cellulolytic activity compared to control (P = 0.020) and ZN2 diets (P = 0.002). It can be concluded that zeolites can act in the origin- and dose-dependent manner. An increased activity of carbohydrate-digesting enzymes can be related to buffering properties of zeolites, which create favourable conditions for the growth and development of microorganisms. Differences between zeolites action on studied parameters may be derived from their chemical composition and particle size.
FUNDING
This research was funded by National Science Centre in Poland as a part of the Miniatura 6 project entitled ‘The role of natural and synthetic zeolites in the methanogenesis process in ruminants. Preliminary in vivo studies on the cow model’ (grant no. 2022/06/X/NZ9/00385), which enabled to conduct an experiment on animals. The analysis of the enzyme activity was supported by the statutory funding of The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jabłonna, Poland.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
AOAC International, 2011. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th edition. Arlington, VA
 
2.
Bacakova L., Vandrovcova M., Kopova I., Jirka I., 2018. Applications of zeolites in biotechnology and medicine - a review. Biomater. Sci. 6, 974−989, https://doi.org/10.1039/C8BM00....
 
3.
El-Nile A., Elazab M., El-Zaiat H., El-Azrak K.E.-D., Elkomy A., Sallam S., Soltan Y., 2021. In vitro and in vivo assessment of dietary supplementation of both natural or nano-zeolite in goat diets: Effects on ruminal fermentation and nutrients digestibility. Animals 11, 2215, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani110....
 
4.
Galindo J., Elías A., Piedra R., Lezcano O., 1990. The effect of some zeolite components on the rumen microbial activity of silage diets. Cub. J. Agric. Sci. 24, 187−194.
 
5.
Ghoneem W.M.A., El-Tanany R.R., Mahmoud A.E.M., 2022. Effect of natural zeolite as a rumen buffer on growth performance and nitrogen utilization of Barki lambs. Pakistan J. Zool. 54, 1199−1207, https://doi.org/10.17582/journ....
 
6.
Guo T., Cao S., Su R., Li Z., Hu P., Xu Z., 2011. Adsorptive property of Cu2+ -loaded montmorillonite clays for Escherichia coli K88 in vitro. J. Environ. Sci. 23, 1808-1815, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-....
 
7.
Hemken R.W., et al., 1983. In Pond W.G. and Mumpton F.A. Zeo-Agriculture: Use of natural zeolite in agriculture and aquaculture, Westview Press, 1st Edition, pp. 171−176.
 
8.
Hrenović J., Tibljaš D., Sekovanić L., Ivanković T., Rožić M., 2008. Effect of natural and synthetic zeolites on bacteria. Proceedings of the I Croatian Symposium on Zeolites, Zagreb, pp. 33−37.
 
9.
Kardaya D., Sudrajat D., Wahyuni D., 2023. Performance of local sheep fed diets containing urea-impregnated zeolite. J. Anim. Health Prod. 11, 199−205, https://doi.org/10.17582/journ....
 
10.
Khachlouf K., Hamed H., Gdoura R., Gargouri A., 2018. Effects of zeolite supplementation on dairy cow production and ruminal parameters - a review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 18, 857−877, https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2....
 
11.
Klaeui C., de Haro Marti M.E., Chahine M., Chibisa G.E., 2020. Altering the particle size of supplemental zeolite (clinoptilolite): effects on nitrogen utilization and nutrient digestibility in backgrounding cattle. Transl. Anim. Sci. 4, S132−S136, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/tx....
 
12.
Laurino C., Palmieri B., 2015. Zeolite: “the magic stone”; main nutritional, environmental, experimental and clinical fields of application. Nutr. Hosp. 32, 573−581, https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.201....
 
13.
Mahdavirad N., Chaji M., Bojarpour M., Dehghanbanadaky M., 2021. Comparison of the effect of sodium bicarbonate, sodium sesquicarbonate, and zeolite as rumen buffers on apparent digestibility, growth performance, and rumen fermentation parameters of Arabi lambs. Tropic. Anim. Health Prod. 53, 465, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250....
 
14.
Majewska M.P., Kędzierska A., Miltko R., Bełżecki G., Kowalik B., 2022. Does humate supplementation affect ciliate population and fermentation parameters in the sheep rumen? J. Anim. Feed Sci. 31, 371−378, https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/....
 
15.
McCollum F.T., Galyean M.L., 1983. Effects of clinoptilolite on rumen fermentation, digestion and feedlot performance in beef steers fed high concentrate diets. J. Anim. Sci. 56, 517−524, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas198....
 
16.
Miltko R., Bełżecki G., Kowalik B., Skomiał J., 2016. Presence of carbohydrate-digesting enzymes throughout the digestive tract of sheep. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 40, 271−277, https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-15....
 
17.
Miltko R., Majewska M.P., Wojtak W., Białek M., Kowalik B., Czauderna M., 2024a. Comparing the chemical composition of lesser duckweed (Lemna minor L.) grown in natural and laboratory settings. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 33, 357−367, https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/....
 
18.
Miltko R., Majewska M.P., Frączek N., Kowalik B., 2024b. Evaluation of the biochemical composition of the greater duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza (L. Schleiden). J. Anim. Feed Sci. 33, 4, 542−546, https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/....
 
19.
Ništiar F., Mojžiš J., Kovác G., Seidel H., Rácz O., 2000. Influence of intoxication with organophosphates on rumen bacteria and rumen protozoa and protective effect of clinoptilolite-rich zeolite on bacterial and protozoan concentration in rumen. Folia Microbiol. 45, 567−571, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0281....
 
20.
NRC, 2001. Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle. National Research Council. 7th revised Edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
 
21.
Simona M., Camelia T., 2019. Zeolites applications in veterinary medicine. In: Zeolites - New Challenges. IntechOpen, pp. 1−16, https://doi.org/10.5772/intech....
 
22.
Smical I., 2011. Properties of natural zeolites in benefit of nutrition and health. HVM Bioflux 3, 51−57.
 
23.
Trckova M., Matlova L., Dvorska L., Pavlik I., 2004. Kaolin, bentonite, and zeolites as feed supplements for animals: health advantages and risks. Vet. Med.-Czech 49(10), 389−399, https://doi.org/10.17221/5728-....
 
24.
Ural D.A., Ural K., 2017. Effects of short term clinoptilolite supplementation on weight gain in Holstein calves. Rev. MVZ Córdoba 22, 5631−5637, https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.....
 
25.
Valpotić H., Gračner D., Turk R. et al., 2017. Zeolite clinoptilolite nanoporous feed additive for animals of veterinary importance: Potentials and limitations. Period. Biol. 119, 159−172, https://doi.org/10.18054/pb.v1....
 
26.
Weiß S., Lebuhn M., Andrade D., Zankel A., Cardinale M., Birner-Gruenberger R., Somitsch W., Ueberbacher B.J., Guebitz G.M., 2013. Activated zeolite - suitable carriers for microorganisms in anaerobic digestion processes? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 3225−3238, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253....
 
ISSN:1230-1388
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top