ORIGINAL PAPER
The nutritive value of hulled and hulless barley
for growing pigs.
1. Determination of energy and protein digestibility
with the in vivo and in vitro method
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science,
University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
Publication date: 2003-10-28
Corresponding author
W. C. Sauer
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science,
University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2003;12(4):759-769
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
An experiment was conducted to determine the digestibility of energy and crude protein (CP) in
hulled and hulless barley with the in vivo and in vitro method. Six barrows were fed six diets according to a 6 × 6 Latin square design. The six diets included 950 g kg-1 of four barleys and two mixtures. Diet A: hulled barley, c.v. Harrington I. Diet B: hulled barley, c.v. Harrington II. The origin of
c.v. Harrington in diet B was different from that in diet A, and therefore referred to as c.v. Harrington II. Diet C: hulless barley, c.v. CDC Buck. Diet D: hulless barley, c.v. CDC Richard. Diet E: mixture of c.v. Harrington I and c.v. CDC Buck (50:50, wt/wt). Diet F: mixture of c.v. Harrington II
and c.v. CDC Richard (50:50, wt/wt). The mixtures were created in order to establish linear regression equations between in vivo and in vitro methods. Chromic oxide was used as the digestibility
marker. The barrows were fed twice daily, at 08.00 and 20.00 h. Each experimental period consisted
of an 8-d adaptation period followed by a 2-d collection period of faeces. The initial and final average body weights of the barrows were 40 and 90 kg, respectively. The in vivo energy digestibilities
were higher (P < 0.05) in the hulless (81.4 to 84.7%) than in the hulled barleys (76.9 to 77.6%). The
digestible energy contents in the hulless barleys ranged from 14.01 to 14.60 MJ kg-1 while the contents in the hulled barleys ranged from 13.05 to 13.16 MJ kg-1 (as-fed). The average digestible CP
contents in the hulled and hulless barleys were nearly similar and were 88.0 and 89.7 g kg-1 (as-fed),
respectively. The in vivo energy and CP digestibilities in the barleys and their mixtures can be accurately predicted by in vitro values, as these were very high correlations between these methods for
energy (r2 = 0.93) and CP (r2 = 0.87).
CITATIONS (16):
1.
Review: Prediction of variation in energetic value of wheat for poultry
M. Yegani, D. R. Korver
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
2.
Using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system to predict the energetic value of corn for ducks1
F. Zhao, L. Zhang, B. M. Mi, H. F. Zhang, S. S. Hou, Z. Y. Zhang
Poultry Science
3.
The effect of digestive activity of pig gastro-intestinal tract on zeolite-rich rocks: An in vitro study
Mariano Mercurio, Piergiulio Cappelletti, Bruno de Gennaro, Maurizio de Gennaro, Fulvia Bovera, Francesco Iannaccone, Celestino Grifa, Alessio Langella, Vincenzo Monetti, Luigi Esposito
Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
4.
Alternative prediction methods of protein and energy evaluation of pig feeds
Ewa Święch
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
5.
Digestibility Is Similar between Commercial Diets That Provide Ingredients with Different Perceived Glycemic Responses and the Inaccuracy of Using the Modified Atwater Calculation to Calculate Metabolizable Energy
Natalie Asaro, Marcial Guevara, Kimberley Berendt, Ruurd Zijlstra, Anna Shoveller
Veterinary Sciences
6.
In vitro digestibility techniques to predict apparent total tract energy digestibility of wheat in grower pigs12
P. R. Regmi, N. S. Ferguson, R. T. Zijlstra
Journal of Animal Science
7.
Effect of low-phytate barley or phytase supplementation to a barley-soybean meal diet on phosphorus retention and excretion by grower pigs1,2
J. K. Htoo, W. C. Sauer, J. L. Yáñez, M. Cervantes, Y. Zhang, J. H. Helm, R. T. Zijlstra
Journal of Animal Science
8.
Prediction of in vivo apparent total tract energy digestibility of barley in grower pigs using an in vitro digestibility technique1
P. R. Regmi, W. C. Sauer, R. T. Zijlstra
Journal of Animal Science
9.
Digestible energy of sorghum grain for pigs could be predicted using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system
L. Pan, X.S. Piao, Y. Wu, H. Ma, X.K. Ma, Q.H. Shan, L. Liu, D.F. Li
Animal Feed Science and Technology
10.
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Food Digestion
Carlos A. Montoya, Suzanne Hodgkinson, Paul J. Moughan
11.
In Vitro Techniques Using the DaisyII Incubator for the Assessment of Digestibility: A Review
Sonia Tassone, Riccardo Fortina, Pier Peiretti
Animals
12.
Trends in feed evaluation for poultry with emphasis on in vitro techniques
Faegheh Zaefarian, Aaron Cowieson, Katrine Pontoppidan, M. Abdollahi, Velmurugu Ravindran
Animal Nutrition
13.
Measures Matter—Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine
Gerald Shurson, Yuan-Tai Hung, Jae Jang, Pedro Urriola
Animals
14.
Fermentation of Barley by Using
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
: Examination of Barley as a Feedstock for Bioethanol Production and Value-Added Products
Amera Gibreel, James Sandercock, Jingui Lan, Laksiri Goonewardene, Ruurd Zijlstra, Jonathan Curtis, David Bressler
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
15.
Effect of Fiber Fermentation and Protein Digestion Kinetics on Mineral Digestion in Pigs
Charlotte Heyer, Neil Jaworski, Greg Page, Ruurd Zijlstra
Animals
16.
A comparative study on in vitro and in vivo stomach–small intestinal and large intestinal digestion of plant protein meals in growing pigs
Zhongyuan Du, Lixiang Gao, Yuming Wang, Jingjing Xie, Shuli Zeng, Jiangtao Zhao, Renna Sa, Feng Zhao
Journal of Animal Science