ORIGINAL PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
One of the efficient techniques for preserving high moisture forages is ensiling. However, the successful ensiling progress of legumes largely depends on the epiphytic microbial flora, buffering capacity, and the water soluble carbohydrate content of the ensiled forage. In this study, three selected strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), were used as microbial additives (at 106 CFU/g fresh matter) to fodder pea (Pisum sativum L.). These strains included Lactobacillus bifermentans (LS-65-2-2) and Lactobacillus plantarum (LS-72-2), both isolated from rangelands in Turkiye, along with Bacillus subtilis, which is already applied for these purposes. The aim was to assess the effects of these strains on microbial composition and the quality of the resulting silage. Silage opening was conducted at five time points (on days 0, 2, 5, 7 and 45) with three replicates. The effects of LAB inoculations were determined to be statistically different (P < 0.001). The study results demonstrated the following values of the parameters tested: pH (4.52–4.86), lactic acid bacteria (5.51–8.46 log10 CFU/g silage), enterobacteria (2.24–3.61 log10 CFU/g silage), yeasts (6.20–7.03 log10 CFU/g silage), neutral detergent fibre (38.85–41.93%), acid detergent fibre (ADF, 32.91–35.75%), and relative feed value (RFV, 135.90–151.73). LAB inoculations caused a significant decrease in pH and an increase in dry matter (DM) recovery (P < 0.001) in fodder pea silage compared to the control. The abundance of LAB in the silages increased significantly (P < 0.001), while the content of enterobacteria (P < 0.001), pH, NH3-N (P < 0.01) and ADF (P < 0.05) in inoculated silages decreased. The RFV significantly improved following inoculation with the L. bifermentans strain. Overall, the addition of LAB strains improved the fermentation process and silage quality compared to B. subtilis, as well as enhanced DM recovery and reduced silage pH.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The microbial materials used in this study were isolated as part of the project supported by TUBITAK (Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye), ID No: 110O694.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Akbay F., Günaydin T., Arikan S., Kizilsimsek M., 2023a. Performance of new lactic acid bacteria strains as ınoculants on the microorganism composition during fermentation of alfalfa silage containing different dry matter content. Black Sea J. Agri. 6, 402–410, https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagr....
 
2.
Akbay F., Günaydın, T., Arıkan S., Kızılsımsek M., 2023b. Usage opportunity of asparagus officinalis l. ınoculated with lactic acid bacteria as silage feed. Kahramanmaras Sutçu Imam Univ. J. Agri. Nature 26, 1199–1208, https://doi.org/10.18016/ksuta....
 
3.
AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th edition. The Association Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA (USA).
 
4.
Bai J., Ding Z., Ke W., Xu D., Wang M., Huang W., Zhang Y., Liu F., Guo X., 2021. Different lactic acid bacteria and their combinations regulated the fermentation process of ensiled alfalfa: ensiling characteristics, dynamics of bacterial community and their functional shifts. Microb. Biotechnol. 14, 1171, https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7....
 
5.
Bai J., Franco M., Ding Z., Hao L., Ke W., Wang M., Guo X., 2022. Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis on fermentation, dynamics of bacterial community and their functional shifts of whole-plant corn silage. J. Anim. Sci. Biotech. 13, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104....
 
6.
Blagojević M., Đorđević N., Bora D., Marković J., Vasić T., Milenković J., Petrović M., 2017. Determination of green forage and silage protein degradability of some pea (Pisum sativum L.) + oat (Avena sativa L.) mixtures grown in Serbia. J. Agri. Sci. 23, 415–422, https://doi.org/10.15832/ankut....
 
7.
Cai Y., Benno Y., Ogawa M., Kumai S., 1999. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 520–526, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0....
 
8.
Canbolat Ö., Akbay K.C., Kamalak A., 2019. Possibilities of use of molasses as carbohydrate source in pea silages. Kahramanmaras Sutçu Imam Univ. J. Agri. Nature 22, 122–130, https://doi.org/10.18016/ksuta....
 
9.
Ellis J. L., Hindrichsen I.K., Klop G., Kinley R.D., Milora N., Bannink A., Dijkstra J., 2016. Effects of lactic acid bacteria silage inoculation on methane emission and productivity of Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 99, 7159–7174, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
 
10.
Ertekin İ., Kızılşimşek M., 2020. Effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculation in pre-harvesting period on fermentation and feed quality properties of alfalfa silage. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 33, 245, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1....
 
11.
Fraser M.D., Fychan R., Jones R., 2001. The effect of harvest date and inoculation on the yield, fermentation characteristics and feeding value of forage pea and field bean silages. Grass Forage Sci. 56, 218–230, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365....
 
12.
Günaydın T., Akbay F., Arıkan S. Kızılsımsek M., 2023. Effects of different lactic acid bacteria inoculants on alfalfa silage fermentation and quality. J. Agri. Sci. 29, 555–560, https://doi.org/10.15832/ankut....
 
13.
Kizilşimşek M., Keklik K., Günaydin T., 2020. Using possibilities of new lactic acid bacteria isolates as microbial inoculant on different dry matter containing alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage. Kahramanmaras Sutçu Imam Univ. J. Agri. Nature 23, 1331–1339, https://doi.org/10.18016/ksuta....
 
14.
Koç F., Aksoy S.O., Okur A.A., Celikyurt G., Korucu D., Ozduven M.L., 2017. Effect of pre-fermented juice, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of high dry matter alfalfa bale silage. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 27, 1766–1773.
 
15.
Kung Jr. L., Shaver R.D., Grant R.J., Schmidt R.J., 2018. Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J. Dairy Sci. 101, 4020–4033, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20....
 
16.
Muck R., 2013. Recent advances in silage microbiology. Agri. Food Sci. 22, 3–15, https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci....
 
17.
Muck R.E., 1988. Factors influencing silage quality and their implications for management. J. Dairy Sci. 71, 2992–3002, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0....
 
18.
Muck R.E., 2010. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Rev. Bras. de Zootecnia 39, 183–191, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-....
 
19.
Okuyucu B., Koç F., Özdüven M.L., 2018. The effects of different doses lactic acid bacteria and enzyme mixture inoculants on the fermentation, aerobic stability and feed value of alfalfa silage. 2nd International Animal Nutrition Congress, November 1-4, Antalya/TURKIYE 193–198.
 
20.
Peng C., Sun W., Dong X., Zhao L., Hao J., 2021. Isolation, identification and utilization of lactic acid bacteria from silage in a warm and humid climate area. Sci. Rep. 11, 12586, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
 
21.
Ren H., Wang L., Sun Y., Zhao Q., Sun Y., Li J., Zhang B., 2021. Enhancing the Co-ensiling performance of corn stover and cabbage waste via the addition of cellulase. Biores. 16, 6342–6362, https://doi.org/10.15376/biore....
 
22.
Robinson P.H., Swanepoel N., Heguy J.M., Price P., Meyer D.M., 2016. Total ‘shrink’losses, and where they occur, in commercially sized silage piles constructed from immature and mature cereal crops. Sci. Total Environ. 559, 45–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
 
23.
Scherer R., Gerlach K., Taubert J., Adolph S., Weiß K., Südekum K.H., 2019. Impact of forage species and ensiling conditions on silage composition and quality and the feed choice behaviour of goats. 74, 47, https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12....
 
24.
Van Soest P.V., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A.,1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 3583–3597, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0....
 
25.
Wang Y., He L., Xing Y., Zhou W., Pian R., Yang F., Zhang Q., 2019. Bacterial diversity and fermentation quality of Moringa oleifera leaves silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria inoculants and stored at different temperatures. Biores. Technol. 284, 349–358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior....
 
26.
Weinberg Z.G., Muck R.E., 1996. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 19, 53–63, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574....
 
27.
Yang F., Wang Y., Zhao S., Wang Y., 2020. Lactobacillus plantarum inoculants delay spoilage of high moisture alfalfa silages by regulating bacterial community composition. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1989, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.....
 
28.
Zhang L., Ma Q., Ma S., Zhang J., Jia R., Ji C., Zhao L., 2016. Ameliorating effects of Bacillus subtilis ANSB060 on growth performance, antioxidant functions, and aflatoxin residues in ducks fed diets contaminated with aflatoxins. Toxins 9, 1, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins....
 
ISSN:1230-1388
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top